Complete sourcing guide for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$5.5 - $20
Verified Suppliers
3
Sourcing Strategies
2
AI-generated product visualizations for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant
A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foshan Yuanyang Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Guangdong, Foshan, Sanshui District, Southwest Street, Jinxiang 1st Road, Workshop No. 4 | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.52% | 160 | Excellent Quality | Metal CanMetal BoxPersonal Care Appliance Accessories | Quality 5.0 Returns 2.0 Logistics 3.4 Consult 2.0 Dispute 0.0 Overall 3.5 | View contact | |
Foshan Sanshui Chuangxin Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Guangdong, Foshan, Sanshui District, Jinbenzhoubian Private Industrial Zone, Jinxiang 1st Road, No. 4 | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.86% | 402 | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Metal CanMetal BoxPersonal Care Appliance Accessories | Quality 5.0 Returns 5.0 Logistics 4.1 Consult 2.0 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact | |
Xingfu Biotechnology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Guangdong, Zhaoqing, Sihui City, Xiamiao Town, Industrial Cluster Development Zone, Self-numbered No. 15-1 | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.73% | 1.8k | Good Dispute | Sheet MaskFace CreamLiquid Essence | Quality 3.3 Returns 3.3 Logistics 2.0 Consult 3.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 3.5 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 9 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | 13 | ¥1 | ¥4 | ¥8 |
| Foshan, Guangdong | 7 | ¥2 | ¥6 | ¥11 |
| Shantou, Guangdong | 6 | ¥1 | ¥1 | ¥2 |
| Nanyang, Henan | 4 | ¥2 | ¥3 | ¥5 |
| Yunfu, Guangdong | 2 | ¥5 | ¥6 | ¥8 |
| Zhaoqing, Guangdong | 2 | ¥2 | ¥7 | ¥12 |
China's deodorant production is heavily concentrated in Guangdong province, with Guangzhou emerging as the primary center for R&D and full-service manufacturing. Clusters in Shantou offer highly cost-effective solutions for mass-market products, while Zhejiang province provides critical expertise in the cosmetic packaging necessary for sustainable and refillable deodorant formats.
Best For: Brands seeking full-service development, custom formulations, and a wide choice of established manufacturers for mid- to premium-tier products.
Why Strong: As the largest cluster, Guangzhou is a principal hub for cosmetics with a deep network of OEM/ODM suppliers. It offers strong R&D capabilities and a well-established supply chain for raw materials and...
⚠️ High concentration of suppliers can lead to greater competition for production slots and potentially higher minimum order quantities (MOQs) compared t...
Best For: Sourcing high-volume, mass-market deodorants where achieving a low price point is the primary objective.
Why Strong: This cluster shows the most competitive pricing in the dataset, indicating a strong focus on cost-efficiency and large-scale production within the broader Guangdong cosmetics ecosystem.
⚠️ Suppliers may be more focused on standardized formulations and less on bespoke R&D or complex, premium packaging.
Best For: Buyers looking for alternative suppliers within Guangdong that can provide a balance between production cost and product quality.
Why Strong: A significant cluster within the Pearl River Delta manufacturing zone, offering a solid number of suppliers. The pricing structure suggests a focus on mid-range products, balancing quality and cost.
⚠️ Average pricing is higher than in Shantou, making it less suitable for buyers focused solely on the lowest possible cost.
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foshan Yuanyang Hardware Produ... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 3.4 |
| Foshan Sanshui Chuangxin Hardw... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Xingfu Biotechnology (Guangdon... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.3 | 2.0 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
The primary cost drivers for a refillable deodorant system are the reusable case material and the formula itself. To manage costs effectively, start by selecting a case material that aligns with your target price point (e.g., PCR plastic vs. aluminum), then optimize the formula by using stock scents, and finally, choose the most cost-effective plastic-free refill packaging.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Material: Aluminum/Zinc → 100% PCR Plastic | ↓ High | Medium | - None | ↓ Low | Significantly changes perceived value and weight. Best for value-segment products. |
| Refill Packaging: Molded Pulp Tray → FSC Cardboard Tube | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ Low | Cardboard is generally cheaper and has lower tooling costs than custom molded pulp. |
| Formula/Scent: Custom → Stock | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Medium | ↓ High | Eliminates R&D, stability testing lead time, and custom fragrance development fees. |
| Mechanism: 'Zero-Waste' Screw → Standard Twist/Push-up | ↓ Low–Medium | Medium | - None | - None | Reduces complexity and part count, but may lead to some product waste at the end of the refill. |
| Refill Size: Reduce formula weight per refill (e.g., 45g → 35g) | ↓ Low | Medium | - None | - None | Lowers unit cost but can negatively impact consumer perception of value and longevity. |
| Increase MOQ (e.g., 5k → 10k units) | ↓ Medium | Low | ↑ High | - None | Amortizes fixed costs (tooling, setup) and enables better price breaks on components and filling. |
Ready to create your deodorant line? Submit a sourcing request with your target specs and we'll connect you with vetted suppliers that match your cost and quality goals.
The most critical quality failures reported by customers are mechanical: the deodorant stick breaking off its base and the refill mechanism failing. Formula-related issues like melting, leaving residue, and causing skin irritation are also common and can severely damage brand reputation.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Poor adhesion between formula and base platform; brittle formula; weak or poorly designed plastic base.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify base material (e.g., POM for strength) and design. Require adhesion/torque testing on the formula-base connection.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Apply moderate lateral pressure to the stick. It should not snap or detach. Cycle the mechanism fully up and down.
Root Cause
Poor tolerances between case and refill; weak plastic parts in mechanism; design flaw prevents full extension.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide detailed CAD files with strict tolerances (±0.1mm). Specify durable materials for moving parts. Require a 'full use' cycle test.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Insert and remove a refill 10 times to check for fit. Twist the mechanism fully to ensure the platform rises to the top edge without jamming.
Root Cause
Low melting point of waxes/oils in the formula; unstable emulsion.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify required formula stability (e.g., must remain solid and not deform after 48 hours at 45°C / 113°F).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Place a sample in a warm environment (e.g., sunny window or low-temp oven) and check for sweating, melting, or deformation.
Root Cause
High concentration of certain powders (e.g., baking soda, arrowroot); formula not properly emulsified.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify performance requirement: 'glides on clear' and 'non-staining on dark fabrics'. Request samples for fabric testing.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Apply the deodorant to a black cotton swatch. Let it sit for 10 minutes, then check for visible white marks or greasy residue.
Root Cause
Allergenic ingredients, often from fragrance oils or baking soda.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide a full list of prohibited ingredients. For 'sensitive skin' claims, require a baking soda-free formula and hypoallergenic testing reports.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Review the supplier's Certificate of Analysis (COA) and Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for all ingredients to ensure compliance.
Root Cause
Poor quality control in manufacturing (molding/machining); inadequate surface finish; weak magnet in closure.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify material (e.g., Aluminum 6061), finish (e.g., matte anodization), and magnet strength. Provide a cosmetic defect standard (AQL).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually inspect for cosmetic flaws. Open and close the lid 50 times to check for secure closure. Perform a drop test from 3 feet onto a hard surface.
Root Cause
Inconsistent fragrance oil percentage in batches; low-quality or volatile fragrance oils.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify fragrance oil source and exact concentration (e.g., 1.5%). Approve a master 'golden sample' for scent reference.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Compare the scent of production units directly against the approved golden sample. The character and strength should match.
Root Cause
Flimsy cardboard or pulp material that gets crushed in transit, damaging the deodorant stick.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify paper weight (GSM) for cardboard or thickness/density for molded pulp. Require transit testing (e.g., ISTA-6).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Perform a compression test on the refill packaging. Drop a packed master carton from waist height to check for internal damage.
Don't let quality issues sink your launch. Source with us and we'll help you build a comprehensive QC checklist and inspection plan to protect your brand.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | English SADOER blue wind chimes beads body lotion fragrance small portable ball antiperspirant cross-border wholesale | 1 | ¥1.50 | $0.25 | 58,698 | 246 | 0.0 |
| Antiperspirant/roll-on beadsSe nanaNo1 | Source Item | |
 | Creative Aluminum Can Shower Gel Bottle Fashion Design Leak-Proof Anti-Fall Aluminum Can Eco-Friendly Material Deodorant Shell Empty Can | 1 | ¥19.90 | $3.34 | 2,321 | 36 | 0.0 |
| GuangdongNoYes | Source Item | |
 | High-Quality Aluminum Alloy Material, Strong Sealing, Deodorizing Box, Home Office Travel, Portable Deodorizing Aluminum Packaging, Aluminum Shell | 1000 | ¥3.90 | $0.66 | 3,501 | 4 | 0.0 |
| GuangdongNo1Is1 | Source Item | |
 | Cross-Border Sadoer Orchid Wind Chime Roll-On Deodorant Refreshing Fragrance Small Portable Roll-On Fragrance Antiperspirant Wholesale | 3 | ¥1.50 | $0.25 | 6,485 | 14 | 0.0 |
| Antiperspirant/roll-on beadsHan chanNo | Source Item |
Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Sustainable & Refillable Deodorantproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Deodorant → Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant → Sourcing
