Complete sourcing guide for Calming & Soothing Mist including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$12 - $72
Verified Suppliers
1
Sourcing Strategies
2
AI-generated product visualizations for Calming & Soothing Mist



A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haote Daily Necessities Factory, Yunlu Town, Jiedong District, Jieyang City Guangdong Jieyang Jieyang City | — | Tier 5 | 5+ | 0.43% | 546 | Low ReturnsGood DisputeGood ServiceLabor & Material | Face CreamLiquid EssenceCleansing Products | Quality 3.0 Returns 4.0 Logistics 3.0 Consult 2.5 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 8 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | 9 | ¥1 | ¥6 | ¥19 |
| Foshan, Guangdong | 4 | ¥0 | ¥6 | ¥17 |
| Zhaoqing, Guangdong | 3 | ¥0 | ¥2 | ¥3 |
| Shantou, Guangdong | 3 | ¥6 | ¥7 | ¥8 |
| Yichun, Jiangxi | 1 | ¥2 | ¥2 | ¥2 |
| Yunfu, Guangdong | 1 | ¥8 | ¥8 | ¥8 |
Sourcing for calming and soothing mist sprays is heavily concentrated in China's Guangdong province. The cities of Guangzhou and Foshan represent the core manufacturing base, offering a high density of suppliers for cosmetic packaging, while the nearby city of Zhaoqing provides highly cost-effective options for mass-market needs.
Best For: Sourcing a diverse range of mist sprayers, including custom designs and specialized cosmetic packaging solutions.
Why Strong: As the largest cluster, Guangzhou is a major hub for cosmetic packaging within the Pearl River Delta. The region is known for its deep supplier network and rapid prototyping capabilities, offering a w...
⚠️ Higher competition among buyers may exist due to the high concentration of well-established suppliers.
Best For: Alternative or secondary sourcing for standard mist sprayers, leveraging the region's established infrastructure.
Why Strong: Located within the Pearl River Delta manufacturing ecosystem, Foshan offers a solid secondary cluster of suppliers, providing additional sourcing depth and capacity close to the main Guangzhou hub.
⚠️ Supplier capabilities may be less diverse compared to the primary hub in Guangzhou.
Best For: Cost-effective, high-volume production of standard or basic mist sprayers for mass-market distribution.
Why Strong: This cluster stands out for its highly competitive pricing structure. It serves as a key location for buyers prioritizing cost efficiency in their supply chain.
⚠️ May have fewer options for complex or highly customized sprayer designs compared to more established cosmetic packaging hubs.
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haote Daily Necessities Factor... | TIER 5 | 0+ | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
To effectively manage cost, focus on the formula's active ingredient concentration, the primary packaging material (plastic vs. glass), and the quality of the spray nozzle. These three components represent the largest share of the unit cost.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduce active ingredient concentration / use cheaper alternatives | ↓ High | High | - None | - None | Example: Switch from high-concentration Cica to more cost-effective Aloe Vera or Glycerin. Directly impacts efficacy and marketing claims. |
| Switch from Glass to PCR/PET plastic bottle | ↓ High | Medium | - None | ↓ Low | Reduces material cost, breakage risk, and shipping weight. May affect premium perception. |
| Downgrade from premium 'fine mist' to standard spray nozzle | ↓ Medium–High | High | - None | - None | Significantly degrades the user's sensory experience, a key purchase driver. High risk of negative reviews. |
| Use stock bottle and sprayer vs. custom mold | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ High | Eliminates high upfront tooling costs and long development lead times. Less brand differentiation. |
| Switch from multi-color screen printing to a simple adhesive label | ↓ Low–Medium | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Reduces decoration cost per unit and setup fees. Label may be less durable than direct printing. |
| Increase MOQ (e.g., from 5k to 10k units) | ↓ Medium | Low | ↑ High | - None | Unlocks better pricing tiers for both the liquid formula and packaging components. |
Submit a sourcing request with your target specs and let us help you find the perfect balance between cost, quality, and brand experience for your mist spray.
The most critical quality failures for mist sprays are a poor spray pattern (squirting vs. misting), a sticky formula residue, and any form of skin irritation. These issues directly lead to negative reviews and damage brand reputation.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Cheap nozzle mechanism; formula viscosity incompatible with nozzle; clogging from particulates.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify desired spray pattern ('fine, cloud-like mist') and test nozzle with the final formula. Ask for pump actuation force specs.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Actuate sprayer 10 times. Check for consistent fine mist, no 'squirting' or large droplets. Check for clogging after 24h.
Root Cause
Poor formulation; excessive use of humectants like glycerin without balancing ingredients.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Clearly define the desired after-feel: 'non-sticky, non-tacky, fast-absorbing'. Provide a benchmark product if possible.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Spray on forearm, let dry for 1 minute. Skin should feel hydrated and smooth, not sticky to the touch.
Root Cause
Harsh ingredients; high fragrance levels; microbial contamination; pH imbalance.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require formula to be hypoallergenic and dermatologist-tested. Request ingredient MSDS, COA, and preservative efficacy test (PET) results.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Check pH of the formula is within the skin-safe range (typically 4.5-6.0). Conduct a small panel patch test.
Root Cause
Poor fit between bottle thread and sprayer cap; incorrect closure torque during assembly; damaged sealing gasket.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify leak-proof requirement. Ask for assembly torque specifications and QC checks.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Invert a sample of bottles for 24 hours. Place finished goods in a vacuum chamber to simulate air pressure changes during transit.
Root Cause
Ineffective preservative system; unsanitary manufacturing/filling conditions.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require supplier to follow cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Request preservative efficacy testing (challenge test) data.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Send samples from each batch to a 3rd party lab for total viable count (TVC) and specific pathogen testing.
Root Cause
Batch-to-batch variation in raw materials (especially natural extracts); poor process control.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide an approved master sample for scent and a Pantone code for color to be used as the standard.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually and olfactively compare a sample from the new production batch against the approved master standard.
Root Cause
Thin-walled glass; inadequate protective inner/outer packaging for transit.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify glass wall thickness and require ISTA-standard drop tests for master cartons.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Perform a drop test on a sample of fully packed master cartons from a specified height on corners, edges, and faces.
Source with us and receive a comprehensive QC checklist tailored for cosmetic mists to ensure your product meets the highest quality standards.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Suxiu Chen's Nicotinamide Snake Oil Essence Hua Liquid for Autumn and Winter, Moisturizing, Hydrating, Anti-dry Skin, Brightening Hand Care Essential Oil | 1 | ¥1.90 | $1.71 | 12 | 6 | 0.0 |
| Domestic BrandSuxiu Chen'sNo1 | Source Item |
Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Calming & Soothing Mistproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Mist Spray → Calming & Soothing Mist → Sourcing