Sourcy
Sourcy
Sourcing Playbook
AUCosmetics

Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant

Complete sourcing guide for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.

← Back to Trends

FOB Price Range

$6.3 - $25

Verified Suppliers

5

Sourcing Strategies

2

Product Preview

AI-generated product visualizations for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant

Get Free Quote
Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant product 1
Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant product 2
Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant product 3

Sourcing Playbook: Wholesale Sourcing Overview for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant

A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.

Thick-walled, shatter-resistant recycled glass or BPA-free, recycled PET plastic.
A weighted, minimalist case made from anodized aluminum or polished stainless steel with a secure magnetic cap.
Value: 500–1,000 pcs/style, $6.3-$9.9 FOB, 25–35 days
Premium: 200–500 pcs/style, $14-$25 FOB, 30–45 days
Custom labels/prints may add 7–14 days
Verify label + packaging compliance before ordering
Compare pre-production samples to references
Consider 3rd-party inspection for first-time suppliers

Factory Intelligence

Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths

5 suppliers foundAvg. Response: 1%Avg. Years: 0+
SupplierImagesTierYearsResponseFavoritesKey StrengthsProduct ExpertiseShop RatingsContact
Wenzhou Yingguan Paper Products Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Wenzhou Cangnan County, No. 170 Hedi Gao Road, Longgang City, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province
Tier 45+0.57%22
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Paper Cans
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
3.3
Consult
3.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.5
View contact
Foshan Yuanyang Hardware Products Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Foshan, Workshop 1, No. 4 Jinxiang 1st Road, Southwest Street, Sanshui District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province
Tier 45+0.54%160
Excellent Quality
Metal CansMetal BoxesPersonal Care Appliance Accessories
Quality
5.0
Returns
2.0
Logistics
3.7
Consult
2.0
Dispute
0.0
Overall
3.5
View contact
Foshan Sanshui Chuangxin Hardware Products Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Foshan, No. 4 Jinxiang 1st Road, Jinben Zhoubian Private Industrial Zone, Sanshui District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province
Tier 45+0.8%401
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Metal CansMetal BoxesPersonal Care Appliance Accessories
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
4.1
Consult
2.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.5
View contact
Wenzhou Guangnuo Handicrafts Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Wenzhou Wenzhou City
Tier 45+0.57%14
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Paper Cans
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
4.1
Consult
3.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
5.0
View contact
Cangnan County Keying Paper Products Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Wenzhou Wenzhou City
Tier 45+0.56%550
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Paper CansPaper Tubes, Paper Cores
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
3.7
Consult
4.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.5
View contact

Supplier Intelligence for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant

0 verified suppliers across 10 manufacturing hubs

Clusters10
Suppliers0
Super Factories0

Average Ratings Across All Suppliers

0.0

Quality

0.0

Logistics

0.0

Returns

0.0

Disputes

0.0

Support

0.0

Overall

Regional Price Comparison

FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions

RegionSuppliersMin FOBAvg FOBMax FOB
Wenzhou, Zhejiang4¥0¥1¥2
Guangzhou, Guangdong3¥1¥2¥5
Quanzhou, Fujian2¥0¥1¥2
Dongguan, Guangdong2¥0¥1¥3
Zhengzhou, Henan1¥1¥1¥1
Tangshan, Hebei1¥1¥2¥2

Cluster Intelligence

China's deodorant manufacturing is concentrated in key clusters, with Guangdong, Guangzhou standing out as a comprehensive hub for formulation and production. Zhejiang, Wenzhou also presents a strong cluster, supported by the province's known capabilities in cosmetic and refillable packaging solutions. These regions offer a range of options from full-service private label manufacturing to cost-effective packaging sourcing.

Guangdong, Guangzhou

Best For: Full-service private label manufacturing, complex formulations, and sourcing a diverse range of deodorant formats.

Why Strong: A major center for cosmetics and personal care with a well-established supply chain for raw materials and packaging. Suppliers offer comprehensive services from R&D to production for various deodorant...

⚠️ Higher average price points may reflect more comprehensive services, which might not be suitable for buyers with strict cost-reduction targets.

Zhejiang, Wenzhou

Best For: Sourcing cost-effective deodorant products and specialized packaging components for refillable models.

Why Strong: Represents a significant supplier cluster with competitive pricing. The broader Zhejiang region is a known hub for cosmetic packaging components like roll-on bottles and sticks, which is critical for ...

⚠️ While strong in packaging and production, it may have fewer suppliers focused on advanced formulation R&D compared to Guangzhou.

Fujian, Quanzhou

Best For: Cost-sensitive projects and sourcing mass-market packaging for daily chemical products.

Why Strong: This cluster shows the most competitive average pricing in the data. The region is a known specialist in packaging for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and daily chemicals, aligning well with deodora...

⚠️ A smaller supplier base for this specific product may limit options for highly specialized or innovative deodorant formulations.

Verified Suppliers

Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities

CompanyTierYearsQualityLogistics
Wenzhou Yingguan Paper Product...TIER 40+5.03.3
Foshan Yuanyang Hardware Produ...TIER 40+5.03.7
Foshan Sanshui Chuangxin Hardw...TIER 40+5.04.1
Wenzhou Guangnuo Handicrafts C...TIER 40+5.04.1
Cangnan County Keying Paper Pr...TIER 40+5.03.7
Supplier
Yrs
Rating
Actions

Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.

Pricing levers and strategies to cut down production cost for Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant

The primary cost drivers are the reusable case material and the complexity of the deodorant formula. To optimize for price, start by selecting a cost-effective case material (e.g., weighted polymer instead of metal), then simplify the formula by using a supplier's stock base. These two levers offer the most significant impact on unit cost.

Confidence: High
Pricing LeverCost ImpactQuality RiskMOQ ImpactLead TimeNotes
Switch case from metal (Aluminum/Steel) to weighted recycled polymer↓ HighMedium- None- NoneCan still achieve a premium feel with high-density polymers. The 'ocean-bound plastic' story is a strong marketing angle.
Use supplier's stock formula base vs. custom development↓ HighLow↓ Medium↓ HighDramatically reduces R&D and stability testing time. Focus budget on custom scenting the proven base.
Simplify refill packaging (e.g., wax paper wrap vs. paperboard tube)↓ MediumMedium- None↓ LowReduces cost-per-refill, encouraging subscriptions. Risk of refill damage if not handled carefully.
Opt for a stock mechanism vs. custom (e.g., magnetic cap, twist-lock)↓ MediumLow↓ Medium↓ MediumEliminates high tooling costs and lead times. Differentiate with color and finish instead of shape.
Switch roll-on container from glass to recycled PET↓ Low–MediumLow- None- NoneReduces breakage risk and shipping weight/cost. Perceived as less premium than glass by some consumers.
Increase MOQ (e.g., to 5k units)↓ MediumLow↑ High- NoneUnlocks better pricing tiers for both components and formula filling from contract manufacturers.

Key Takeaways

  • Reusable case material (metal vs. polymer) is the single largest cost component.
  • Formula development (custom vs. stock base) dictates R&D, testing costs, and MOQ.
  • Refill packaging (paperboard tube vs. wax wrap) significantly impacts the consumable cost.
  • Mechanism complexity (magnetic caps, custom twist-lock) adds tooling and assembly costs.

Ready to create a standout deodorant line? Submit your project brief and we'll help you navigate material and formula choices to meet your target cost without compromising on quality.

Refillable Deodorant quality risks and defects to look out for

The biggest quality risks are mechanical and chemical: applicator failure (stuck rollerballs, broken mechanisms) and formula instability (leakage, skin irritation, staining). Rigorous testing of the mechanism and formula stability is non-negotiable.

Confidence: High

Container Leakage (Roll-on or melted stick)

Root Cause

Poor cap/bottle fitment; missing/bad silicone gasket; low formula melting point.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Require leak-proof guarantee with silicone gasket. Specify formula stability testing up to 45°C. Define critical dimensional tolerances for all components.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Fill sample units with liquid, lay on side for 24h. Place solid stick samples in a 45°C chamber for 4 hours to check for melting/leaking.

Applicator Failure (Stuck rollerball / broken twist-up)

Root Cause

Poor component molding/tolerances; cheap plastic; weak internal parts.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify rollerball material (steel/glass). Require mechanism lifecycle test data (e.g., 500 cycles).

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Manually test 50 full cycles on random samples. Rollerball should glide smoothly without catching. Twist mechanism should be smooth, not gritty or loose.

Formula Causes Skin Irritation

Root Cause

Inclusion of common irritants (baking soda, high % of essential oils); unstable formula.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Require a 'baking soda-free' formula for sensitive skin. Request Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) data or equivalent safety assessment.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Conduct user testing with a small panel, including individuals with self-declared sensitive skin. Check for redness/irritation after 24h.

Formula Stains Clothing

Root Cause

High concentration of certain oils or waxes in the formula.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify 'non-staining' as a key performance requirement. Ask for their internal test protocol and results for staining.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Apply deodorant to white cotton and black synthetic fabric swatches. Let sit for 8 hours, then wash as normal. Check for residue or oil marks.

Refill Does Not Fit Case

Root Cause

Tolerance drift between production batches; using separate suppliers for case and refill without proper coordination.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Provide master CAD files with critical-to-fit dimensions and tolerances. Ideally, source case and refill from the same supplier.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

During inspection, test-fit a sample of refills from the current batch into cases from the current batch. The fit should be snug but not forced.

Scent Mismatch or Fades

Root Cause

Use of low-grade fragrance oils; poor formula stability; no clear scent standard.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Provide a physical 'master' scent sample. Specify formula must be stable for 24 months. Ask for essential oil grades.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Compare scent of new production to the master sample upon opening and after 24 hours. Check for 'off' or chemical notes.

Case Feels 'Cheap' or Scratches Easily

Root Cause

Thin-walled plastic; low-quality polymer; poor anodizing/coating on metal.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify minimum weight (in grams) for the case. For metal, specify anodizing thickness (e.g., 10-15 microns). For polymer, specify material (e.g., ABS+30% glass fiber).

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Weigh samples to ensure they meet spec. Perform a simple scratch test on coated parts with a fingernail or plastic coin.

Compostable Packaging Fails

Root Cause

Paperboard is not robust enough for humid environments (e.g., bathroom); poor construction.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Request material specs for paperboard, including any PLA or wax lining. Ask for data on performance in high-humidity conditions.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Place a sample in a humid environment (e.g., steamy bathroom) for 48 hours. Check for delamination, warping, or loss of structural integrity.

Don't let quality issues undermine your launch. Partner with us to build a comprehensive QC plan and connect with pre-vetted suppliers who understand cosmetic quality standards.

Ready to Start Sourcing?

Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.

Sourcing Strategies

Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market

Sourcing Sustainable & Refillable Deodorant: Quality Checklist & Import Guide

This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Sustainable & Refillable Deodorantproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.

Pre-Order Quality Checklist

  • Request and evaluate product samples
  • Verify factory certifications and audit reports
  • Confirm sizing specifications with measurement charts
  • Review care instructions and labeling requirements
  • Agree on defect tolerance and QC process

📋 Documentation Requirements

  • HS code classification for customs
  • Commercial invoice and packing list
  • Certificate of Origin (COO)
  • Care label compliance documentation
  • Test reports (as required by product type)

🚢 Sea Freight

  • Transit: 25-35 days to US ports
  • Cost-effective for bulk orders over $3,000
  • Include moisture protection for textiles

✈️ Air Freight

  • Transit: 5-7 days door-to-door
  • Best for samples and urgent orders
  • Higher cost per kg but faster to market

Related Archetypes in Deodorant

Frequently Asked Questions

What payment terms are typical for first orders?

First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.

How do I handle quality issues after receiving goods?

Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.

Should I use a third-party inspection service?

Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.