Sourcy
Sourcy
Sourcing Playbook
Cosmetics

Multi-Functional Deodorant

Complete sourcing guide for Multi-Functional Deodorant including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.

← Back to Trends

FOB Price Range

$1.4 - $18.9

Verified Suppliers

5

Sourcing Strategies

2

Product Preview

AI-generated product visualizations for Multi-Functional Deodorant

Get Free Quote
Multi-Functional Deodorant product 1
Multi-Functional Deodorant product 2
Multi-Functional Deodorant product 3

Sourcing Playbook: Wholesale Sourcing Overview for Multi-Functional Deodorant

A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.

High-density nylon or PU faux leather with reinforced bar-tack stitching
Low-VOC materials, factory airs out products 48 hours before packing
Smooth vegan PU with durable, non-fading finish
Value: 500–1,000 pcs/style, $1.4-$11.67 FOB, 25–35 days
Premium: 200–500 pcs/style, $6.25-$18.9 FOB, 30–45 days
Custom labels/prints may add 7–14 days
Verify label + packaging compliance before ordering
Compare pre-production samples to references
Consider 3rd-party inspection for first-time suppliers

Factory Intelligence

Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths

5 suppliers foundAvg. Response: 1%Avg. Years: 0+
SupplierImagesTierYearsResponseFavoritesKey StrengthsProduct ExpertiseShop RatingsContact
Guangzhou Jinxi Cosmetics Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Guangzhou Baiyun District Longgui Street Nanling Nanye Wuhang Road No. 18 Unit 101
Tier 45+0.75%137
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Liquid EssenceBody Lotion, CreamFace Cream
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
3.4
Consult
4.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.0
View contact
Guangzhou Yashi Cosmetics Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Guangzhou Huadu District Bangsheng 1st Road Yash Creative Park
Tier 45+0.18%906
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Cleansing ProductsLiquid EssenceBody Lotion, Cream
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
4.1
Consult
3.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.5
View contact
Guangzhou Yasheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Guangzhou Baiyun District Taihe Town Longgui Nanling Nanye 8th Horizontal Road No. 22
Tier 45+0.58%45
Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Body Lotion, CreamShampoo and Conditioner SetsFace Cream
Quality
5.0
Returns
5.0
Logistics
2.9
Consult
2.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.0
View contact
Shantou Shengmoya Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Shantou Shantou City Heping
Tier 45+0.57%464
Low ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
ShampooShower Gel, Body WashSoap, Bath Bombs
Quality
1.7
Returns
4.3
Logistics
5.0
Consult
3.0
Dispute
5.0
Overall
4.5
View contact
Shantou Huanyuxuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Shantou Shantou City Industrial Building H13
Tier 45+0.86%885
Good QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service
Body Care SetsOther Beauty ToolsScalp Care Products
Quality
4.0
Returns
4.0
Logistics
3.7
Consult
3.0
Dispute
4.0
Overall
4.0
View contact

Supplier Intelligence for Multi-Functional Deodorant

0 verified suppliers across 10 manufacturing hubs

Clusters10
Suppliers0
Super Factories0

Average Ratings Across All Suppliers

0.0

Quality

0.0

Logistics

0.0

Returns

0.0

Disputes

0.0

Support

0.0

Overall

Regional Price Comparison

FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions

RegionSuppliersMin FOBAvg FOBMax FOB
Guangzhou, Guangdong15¥1¥9¥87
Foshan, Guangdong6¥2¥6¥11
Shantou, Guangdong4¥1¥2¥4
Nanyang, Henan3¥2¥3¥5
Yunfu, Guangdong2¥5¥6¥8
Dongguan, Guangdong2¥5¥9¥12

Cluster Intelligence

Guangdong province dominates the deodorant manufacturing landscape, with Guangzhou serving as the primary hub. This city offers the largest concentration of suppliers and a mature cosmetics supply chain, while nearby clusters like Foshan and Shantou provide alternative options with varying cost structures. Zhejiang province also emerges as a key region for export-oriented production.

Guangdong, Guangzhou

Best For: Sourcing a diverse range of deodorant products, including custom formulations, private label, and premium multi-functional options like sprays, roll-ons, and creams.

Why Strong: As a primary center for cosmetics manufacturing in China, Guangzhou has the highest concentration of deodorant suppliers. It boasts a well-established and comprehensive supply chain, especially for ra...

⚠️ The wide spectrum of suppliers and price points necessitates careful due diligence to find the right partner for specific quality and capability requi...

Guangdong, Foshan

Best For: Buyers seeking a balance between cost-effectiveness and capability, leveraging the proximity to the extensive supply chain of the Pearl River Delta.

Why Strong: A significant secondary cluster within the dominant Guangdong personal care ecosystem. It offers a solid base of suppliers with more consistent and moderate pricing compared to the broader range found...

⚠️ Fewer suppliers than in Guangzhou, which may result in less variety in terms of advanced formulations and specialized packaging options.

Guangdong, Shantou

Best For: High-volume sourcing of entry-level or mass-market deodorants where achieving a low cost-per-unit is the main priority.

Why Strong: This cluster is distinguished by its highly competitive pricing for deodorant products. It is a key part of the Guangdong manufacturing region, specializing in cost-effective production for the mass m...

⚠️ Production may focus on more basic formulations. Achieving the most competitive price points often requires committing to high minimum order quantitie...

Verified Suppliers

Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities

CompanyTierYearsQualityLogistics
Guangzhou Jinxi Cosmetics Co.,...TIER 40+5.03.4
Guangzhou Yashi Cosmetics Co.,...TIER 40+5.04.1
Guangzhou Yasheng Biotechnolog...TIER 40+5.02.9
Shantou Shengmoya Biotechnolog...TIER 40+1.75.0
Shantou Huanyuxuan Biotechnolo...TIER 40+4.03.7
Supplier
Yrs
Rating
Actions

Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.

Pricing levers and strategies to cut down production cost for Multi-Functional Deodorant

The primary cost drivers for deodorant are the active ingredients in the formula and the primary packaging. To manage costs, first decide on the core formulation (e.g., value-focused Magnesium Hydroxide vs. premium Mandelic Acid), then select the packaging (standard stick vs. airless pump). These two choices will determine over 70% of your unit cost.

Confidence: High
Pricing LeverCost ImpactQuality RiskMOQ ImpactLead TimeNotes
Switch from premium actives (Mandelic Acid) to value actives (Magnesium Hydroxide)↓ HighMedium- None- NoneChanges the core performance and marketing story. Efficacy must be re-validated.
Downgrade packaging from Airless Pump to a standard Twist-Up Stick or Tube↓ HighMedium- None↓ LowReduces premium feel. Ensure formula is compatible with a stick format (requires higher viscosity).
Remove secondary skincare actives (e.g., Niacinamide, Hyaluronic Acid)↓ MediumLow- None- NoneSimplifies the formula but reduces the 'multi-functional' marketing angle.
Use manufacturer's stock fragrance instead of a custom-developed scent↓ Low–MediumLow↓ Low↓ MediumReduces development time and avoids high MOQs often required for custom scents.
Reduce fill volume (e.g., from 75g to 60g)↓ Low–MediumLow- None- NoneDirectly reduces formula cost per unit but may affect consumer perception of value.
Increase MOQ to 10,000+ units↓ MediumLow↑ High- NoneEnables better price breaks on raw materials and packaging components.
Forgo third-party clinical testing for claims (e.g., '24-hour protection')↓ MediumHigh- None↓ MediumSaves significant upfront cost but exposes the brand to legal risks for unsubstantiated claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Active ingredient choice (e.g., Mandelic Acid vs. Magnesium Hydroxide) is the single biggest cost driver.
  • Packaging format (airless pump vs. standard stick) significantly impacts both unit cost and perceived value.
  • Adding secondary skincare actives like Niacinamide increases formula cost and complexity.
  • Custom fragrances and extensive clinical testing for claims add significant upfront and unit costs.
  • Higher MOQs (over 10,000 units) unlock economies of scale for both formula and packaging.

Ready to formulate your winning deodorant? Submit your project brief with us and we'll connect you with vetted manufacturers that fit your cost targets and quality standards.

Deodorant quality risks and defects to look out for

The most critical quality risks for deodorants are skin irritation, lack of efficacy, and undesirable aesthetics like staining or stickiness. These issues directly lead to negative reviews and product returns.

Confidence: High

Skin Irritation / Rash

Root Cause

High pH from baking soda; fragrance allergens; incompatible active ingredients.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify 'baking soda-free'. Request formula pH range. For 'sensitive skin' claims, require Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) data.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Check pH of a production sample. Conduct a small user panel test (24-48h) to check for immediate reactions.

Ineffective Odor Control

Root Cause

Insufficient concentration of active ingredients; unstable formula; wrong active for the claim.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify active ingredient(s) and minimum concentration (e.g., 'Mandelic Acid at 3%'). Define efficacy expectation (e.g., 'effective for 12 hours under normal activity').

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Conduct a 'sniff test' on user panelists after 8-12 hours. Send a sample for lab analysis to verify active ingredient concentration.

White Marks / Staining on Clothes

Root Cause

High content of waxes or certain powders (e.g., zinc oxide, titanium dioxide); poor formula base.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Require an 'invisible application' or 'anti-stain' formula. Request evidence of testing on dark fabrics.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Apply the product to a piece of black cotton fabric, let it dry for 10 minutes, and check for visible residue.

Formula Separation or Grittiness

Root Cause

Poor emulsification; temperature instability; ingredient crystallization.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Require stability test data (e.g., 3 months at 40°C/104°F). Specify a smooth, homogenous texture.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Visually inspect a sample for separation (oils/liquids). Rub a small amount between fingers to feel for gritty particles. Perform a freeze-thaw cycle on a sample.

Packaging Failure (leakage, broken mechanism)

Root Cause

Cheap components; incompatibility between formula and plastic; poor assembly.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify packaging material (e.g., PP, PETG). Require formula-package compatibility testing.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Cycle test the mechanism (twist up/down 20 times). Store a filled unit upside down for 24 hours to check for leaks. Perform a drop test from 1 meter.

Microbial Contamination

Root Cause

Ineffective preservative system; unsanitary manufacturing conditions (non-GMP).

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Require Preservative Efficacy Testing (PET) results. Specify microbial limits (e.g., TVC <1000 CFU/g, no pathogens).

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Send a random sample from the production batch to a third-party lab for a microbial plate count.

Sticky / Wet Texture

Root Cause

High levels of glycols or humectants; slow-drying formula base.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify desired sensory profile, e.g., 'quick-dry', 'powder-finish', 'non-sticky feel'.

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Apply to skin and time how long it takes to feel dry to the touch (e.g., < 2 minutes). Compare against the approved 'golden sample'.

Incorrect Fill Weight

Root Cause

Poorly calibrated filling machines; lack of in-process weight checks.

What to Specify / Ask Supplier

Specify net weight and acceptable tolerance (e.g., 75g ± 2%).

QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)

Weigh a statistical sample of 10-20 finished units to ensure they are within the specified range.

Don't leave quality to chance. We build comprehensive QC protocols and AQL standards into every project to protect your brand and ensure customer satisfaction.

Ready to Start Sourcing?

Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.

Product Examples from 1688

Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings

ProductTitleMOQPrice (CNY)Price (USD)
Sale QuantityHow many units sold
OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688
RatingTiered PricingKey FeaturesLinkAction
Tetrachloroaluminum zirconium oxyhydroxide antiperspirant body odor net taste water underarm odor spray deodorant body lotion for men and women walking bead antiperspirant body

Tetrachloroaluminum zirconium oxyhydroxide antiperspirant body odor net taste water underarm odor spray deodorant body lotion for men and women walking bead antiperspirant body

1¥2.50$0.422,756304.0
  • N/A
OtherOEMAntiperspirant Spray
Source Item
Shengqi Rotating Deodorant Stick PP All Plastic Anti-cracking Solid Perfume Tube 30/50/75g Portable Mud Mask Stick

Shengqi Rotating Deodorant Stick PP All Plastic Anti-cracking Solid Perfume Tube 30/50/75g Portable Mud Mask Stick

1¥2.80$0.47005.0
  • 1-: ¥2.80
YuyaoNoSR-1002
Source Item

Sourcing Strategies

Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market

Sourcing Multi-Functional Deodorant: Quality Checklist & Import Guide

This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Multi-Functional Deodorantproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.

Pre-Order Quality Checklist

  • Request and evaluate product samples
  • Verify factory certifications and audit reports
  • Confirm sizing specifications with measurement charts
  • Review care instructions and labeling requirements
  • Agree on defect tolerance and QC process

📋 Documentation Requirements

  • HS code classification for customs
  • Commercial invoice and packing list
  • Certificate of Origin (COO)
  • Care label compliance documentation
  • Test reports (as required by product type)

🚢 Sea Freight

  • Transit: 25-35 days to US ports
  • Cost-effective for bulk orders over $3,000
  • Include moisture protection for textiles

✈️ Air Freight

  • Transit: 5-7 days door-to-door
  • Best for samples and urgent orders
  • Higher cost per kg but faster to market

Related Archetypes in Deodorant

Frequently Asked Questions

What payment terms are typical for first orders?

First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.

How do I handle quality issues after receiving goods?

Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.

Should I use a third-party inspection service?

Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.

Navigation: All CategoriesDeodorantMulti-Functional DeodorantSourcing