Complete sourcing guide for Sugar-Free Hydration Powders including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$7.5 - $30
Verified Suppliers
5
Sourcing Strategies
2
AI-generated product visualizations for Sugar-Free Hydration Powders
A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guangzhou Baizhitang Health Food Co., Ltd. Jiangsu Suzhou Suzhou City China (Jiangsu) Free Trade Pilot Zone Suzhou Area Suzhou Industrial Park Xinghu Street No. 328 Creative Industrial Park Unit 11-1002-014 | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.79% | 922 | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Composite Health ProductsInstant CoffeeMeal Replacement Powder | Quality 5.0 Returns 5.0 Logistics 3.7 Consult 4.0 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact | |
Zhengzhou Qiaomeihui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Henan Zhengzhou Zhengzhou City Jinshui District Zhengbian Road No. 127 Courtyard Building 2, 5th Floor | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.94% | 5.3k | Good DisputeGood Service | Composite Health ProductsInstant CoffeeMeal Replacement Powder | Quality 2.0 Returns 3.0 Logistics 3.7 Consult 4.5 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact | |
Guangzhou Baizhitang Health Industry Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Guangzhou City Huadu District Guangzhou City Huadu District Jingu North Road No. 30 Self-numbered Building B, 2nd Floor, 3rd Floor, 4th Floor | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.89% | 693 | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Composite Health ProductsProtein Powder Amino AcidsInstant Coffee | Quality 5.0 Returns 5.0 Logistics 3.3 Consult 4.5 Dispute 5.0 Overall 5.0 | View contact | |
Guangzhou Zhongqixingyao Health Technology Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Guangzhou City | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.95% | 97 | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Composite Health ProductsMeal Replacement PowderFunctional Drinks | Quality 5.0 Returns 5.0 Logistics 3.3 Consult 2.0 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact | |
Henan Kanglejun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Henan Zhengzhou Zhengzhou City Jinshui District Global Building | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.97% | 21k | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Composite Health ProductsInstant CoffeeProtein Powder Amino Acids | Quality 5.0 Returns 4.0 Logistics 3.0 Consult 4.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 14 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | 6 | ¥1 | ¥7 | ¥68 |
| Bozhou, Anhui | 4 | ¥2 | ¥5 | ¥9 |
| Suzhou, Anhui | 2 | ¥0 | ¥3 | ¥9 |
| Zhengzhou, Henan | 2 | ¥7 | ¥18 | ¥22 |
| Liaocheng, Shandong | 1 | ¥39 | ¥39 | ¥39 |
| Zhaoqing, Guangdong | 1 | ¥40 | ¥41 | ¥42 |
China's manufacturing for sugar-free electrolyte powders is concentrated in Guangdong and Anhui provinces. Guangdong, Guangzhou stands out as the primary hub with the largest supplier base, specializing in nutritional and health products. Anhui, particularly the cities of Bozhou and Suzhou, presents a significant secondary cluster offering competitive pricing for standard formulations.
Best For: Sourcing a wide variety of custom and standard sugar-free hydration powders from specialized health product manufacturers.
Why Strong: This is a major, established center for producing consumable electrolyte powders and nutritional supplements. The cluster benefits from a deep supply chain and export-oriented infrastructure within th...
⚠️ A very wide price spectrum suggests significant variability in quality, formulation complexity, and supplier scale, requiring careful vetting.
Best For: Cost-effective sourcing of standard electrolyte powder formulations where price is a key consideration.
Why Strong: Represents a notable secondary cluster for electrolyte powders. The data indicates a more concentrated and competitive price structure compared to other major hubs.
⚠️ This region is less documented as a specialized nutritional hub, so buyers may need to conduct more thorough due diligence on supplier capabilities an...
Best For: Exploring low-cost sourcing options for basic or high-volume electrolyte powder mixes.
Why Strong: Data points to this cluster having a highly competitive pricing environment, potentially offering some of the lowest cost options.
⚠️ The limited number of suppliers may indicate smaller-scale operations or trading companies, which could impact production capacity and consistency.
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Baizhitang Health Fo... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 3.7 |
| Zhengzhou Qiaomeihui Pharmaceu... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 2.0 | 3.7 |
| Guangzhou Baizhitang Health In... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 3.3 |
| Guangzhou Zhongqixingyao Healt... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 3.3 |
| Henan Kanglejun Pharmaceutical... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
The primary cost drivers for electrolyte powders are the complexity and purity of the ingredients, followed by the packaging format. To optimize price, focus on the sweetener system and mineral forms first, then evaluate the cost-benefit of functional additives and packaging choices like sachets versus bulk tubs.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Switch from premium sweeteners (Monk Fruit) to a standard blend (Stevia/Erythritol) | ↓ High | Medium | - None | - None | Risk of a slight aftertaste, which is a key consumer complaint. Requires careful flavor masking and sampling. |
| Use more cost-effective mineral forms (e.g., Magnesium Citrate vs. Glycinate) | ↓ Medium | Medium | - None | - None | May affect bioavailability and could cause digestive sensitivity in some users. Less of a 'premium' story. |
| Remove or reduce optional functional ingredients (e.g., B-Vitamins, Vitamin C) | ↓ Low–Medium | Low | - None | - None | Reduces perceived value. Best for a 'value' focused product where core electrolyte function is the priority. |
| Switch from single-serve sachets to a bulk tub format | ↓ High | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ Low | Dramatically lowers cost-per-serve but sacrifices on-the-go convenience. Tubs are faster to produce. |
| Remove powder agglomeration/instantization process | ↓ Medium | High | - None | - None | Significantly increases risk of poor solubility and gritty texture, a major consumer pain point. Not recommended. |
| Increase MOQ (e.g., from 30k to 100k units) | ↓ Medium–High | Low | ↑ High | - None | Unlocks better pricing on raw materials and packaging, and reduces per-unit setup costs. |
| Use standard, high-velocity flavors (e.g., Lemon-Lime) instead of custom profiles | ↓ Low | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ Medium | Avoids R&D costs and delays associated with developing and sourcing unique flavor components. |
Ready to formulate your perfect electrolyte powder? Submit a sourcing request with your target cost-per-serving and we'll help you navigate these pricing levers to create a product that wins in the market.
The most frequent and damaging quality issues are poor taste (chemical/salty), powder clumping inside the package due to moisture, and poor solubility leading to a gritty texture. Addressing these three areas is critical for customer satisfaction.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
High moisture content in raw materials; inadequate drying post-blending; packaging with poor moisture barrier properties.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify max moisture content (e.g., <2%). Ask about production environment (humidity control). Require high-barrier foil or PET/AL/PE laminate for sachets.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Squeeze sealed sachets/tubs; they should feel like loose powder, not a solid brick. Cut open random samples to visually inspect for clumps.
Root Cause
Low-grade sweeteners; poor flavor masking of minerals; unbalanced formula; ingredient oxidation.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify sweetener type and grade (e.g., Rebaudioside A 98% for stevia). Co-develop flavor profile with supplier and approve a 'golden sample'.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Sensory testing: Dissolve a sample as per instructions and taste. Compare against the approved 'golden sample'. It should be free of off-notes.
Root Cause
Incorrect particle size of ingredients; lack of agglomeration process; using non-soluble mineral forms.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require 'instantized' or 'agglomerated' powder. Specify solubility standard (e.g., 'fully dissolves in 200ml water in 30s with stirring').
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Dissolve a sample in a clear glass of water. After stirring, let it sit for 1 minute. No visible sediment or gritty particles should be at the bottom.
Root Cause
Intentional cost-cutting by supplier (e.g., adding maltodextrin); poor batch control and weighing of micro-ingredients.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require a detailed Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for every production batch. Explicitly state 'No Maltodextrin or other fillers' in the contract.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Send a sample from each batch to a third-party lab to verify electrolyte levels (Na, K, Mg) and test for common fillers.
Root Cause
Using cheap packaging film without a proper tear notch or laser scoring.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify 'laser-scored easy-tear opening' for all sachets. Request samples of the exact sachet material and test them.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Attempt to tear open 10-20 random sachets from a production run. They should open cleanly along the score line without excessive force or scissors.
Root Cause
Poor batch-to-batch process control; variation in raw material lots (especially natural flavors/colors).
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Ask about their batch control process. Require them to retain a sample from each batch for future comparison.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually compare the powder color and taste-test samples from different production dates against the approved 'golden sample'. They should be identical.
Don't let quality issues sink your brand. Source with us and we'll build a comprehensive QC checklist and testing protocol to ensure your electrolyte powder is perfect, every time.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Amazon's Best-Selling Keto Electrolyte Powder Package Electrolyte Drink Citrus Salt Export | 10000 | ¥1.50 | $0.25 | 0 | 0 | 5.0 |
| 漉鼎记See packagingPowder | Source Item | |
 | Foreign Trade Amazon Tk Hot Selling Keto Fruit Flavor Electrolyte Powder Package Electrolyte Drink Factory | 500 | ¥16.00 | $2.69 | 0 | 0 | 5.0 |
| NoPowder7844785944 | Source Item |
Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Sugar-Free Hydration Powdersproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Electrolyte Powder → Sugar-Free Hydration Powders → Sourcing
