Complete sourcing guide for Sustainable Pantry Jars including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$19.75 - $72
Verified Suppliers
5
Sourcing Strategies
1
AI-generated product visualizations for Sustainable Pantry Jars
A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fengyang Jinyuan Household Goods Co., Ltd. Anhui Chuzhou Chuzhou City | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.64% | 4k | Good Dispute | Food Storage Containers, Lunch BoxesInsulated Flasks/BottlesGlass Cups | Quality 3.0 Returns 3.3 Logistics 2.1 Consult 3.5 Dispute 4.0 Overall 3.5 | View contact | |
Taizhou Huangyan Jinxiang Plastic Factory Zhejiang Taizhou Taizhou City | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.17% | 10 | Good QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Decorative VasesFood Storage Containers, Lunch BoxesBowls | Quality 4.3 Returns 4.7 Logistics 3.9 Consult 3.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact | |
Shanghai Shenghuogu Industrial Co., Ltd. Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai City | — | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.85% | 63 | Excellent QualityGood DisputeGood Service | Food Storage Containers, Lunch BoxesRefrigerator Storage BoxesSealed Containers, Storage Jars | Quality 5.0 Returns 3.7 Logistics 5.0 Consult 0.0 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact |
Guangzhou Chuangyou Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Guangzhou City Commodity Wholesale City | — | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.49% | 2.3k | Verified | Glass CupsFood Storage Containers, Lunch BoxesPlates | Quality 3.0 Returns 3.0 Logistics 1.1 Consult 1.5 Dispute 3.0 Overall 3.0 | View contact |
Jieyang Hongsen Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Guangdong Jieyang Jieyang City | — | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.69% | 1.1k | Good DisputeGood Service | Food Storage Containers, Lunch BoxesCondiment BoxesRefrigerator Storage Boxes | Quality 2.3 Returns 3.7 Logistics 4.1 Consult 4.0 Dispute 5.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 9 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinhua, Zhejiang | 20 | ¥0 | ¥2 | ¥7 |
| Taizhou, Zhejiang | 9 | ¥2 | ¥7 | ¥14 |
| Ningbo, Zhejiang | 2 | ¥4 | ¥10 | ¥18 |
| Chaozhou, Guangdong | 2 | ¥6 | ¥18 | ¥32 |
| Cangzhou, Hebei | 2 | ¥1 | ¥6 | ¥23 |
| Xuzhou, Jiangsu | 1 | ¥0 | ¥0 | ¥0 |
Zhejiang province, particularly Jinhua and Taizhou, emerges as a primary sourcing hub for pantry jars, offering a wide range of options and material specializations. For specific material needs, buyers should look to Guangdong's Chaozhou for high-end ceramic jars and Jiangsu's Xuzhou for cost-effective glass container manufacturing.
Best For: Sourcing a diverse range of general-purpose pantry jars, particularly for buyers seeking competitive pricing and multiple supplier options for various materials.
Why Strong: Features the largest concentration of suppliers, indicating a highly competitive and mature market. Its location in the manufacturing powerhouse of Zhejiang province suggests a robust supply chain and...
⚠️ As a general manufacturing hub, buyers may need to vet suppliers carefully for specific material expertise (e.g., high-borosilicate glass vs. standard...
Best For: High-quality plastic pantry jars for food and other applications. Ideal for buyers leveraging a region with a strong focus on plastic production technology.
Why Strong: Known as China's 'Plastic Kingdom,' this city has a strong supplier base and deep expertise in plastic manufacturing. This specialization ensures access to a well-developed industrial infrastructure f...
⚠️ Primarily focused on plastics; buyers seeking glass or ceramic alternatives will need to source from other regions. The price range suggests a focus o...
Best For: Premium, decorative, and functional ceramic pantry jars. Best suited for brands focused on high-end quality, unique materials, and aesthetic appeal.
Why Strong: Widely recognized as the 'Capital of Ceramics' in China, this cluster offers unparalleled expertise in ceramic production. This historical specialization provides access to skilled craftsmanship and a...
⚠️ The higher price point reflects the specialized nature and quality of ceramic production. Not suitable for buyers seeking low-cost, mass-market plasti...
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fengyang Jinyuan Household Goo... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Taizhou Huangyan Jinxiang Plas... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Shanghai Shenghuogu Industrial... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Guangzhou Chuangyou Packaging ... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Jieyang Hongsen Plastic Produc... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 2.3 | 4.1 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
To effectively manage costs for pantry jars, the most significant lever is the primary material choice—switching from premium Borosilicate to standard Soda-Lime glass offers the largest savings. Secondary levers include simplifying the lid and seal mechanism and reducing glass thickness, though this increases quality risks. Finally, optimizing packaging and removing non-essential add-ons can provide smaller, incremental cost reductions.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Switch from Borosilicate to Soda-Lime Glass | ↓ High | Medium | - None | - None | Reduces thermal shock resistance and durability. Still maintains a glass aesthetic. |
| Reduce glass wall thickness (e.g., from 3mm to 2.5mm) | ↓ Medium | High | - None | - None | Significantly increases risk of fragility and breakage in transit and use. |
| Switch from premium lid (Acacia/Bamboo) to standard plastic | ↓ Medium | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Changes the aesthetic from 'natural/sustainable' to 'functional'. |
| Simplify seal from double-ring to single-ring silicone gasket | ↓ Low | Medium | - None | - None | Reduces seal redundancy. Must rigorously test for airtightness. |
| Remove value-add bundle (labels, marker, spoons) | ↓ Low | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Reduces perceived value and unboxing experience but simplifies kitting. |
| Downgrade packaging (e.g., cardboard dividers instead of molded pulp) | ↓ Low–Medium | High | - None | - None | Highly discouraged. Increases risk of transit damage, a major customer complaint. |
| Increase MOQ (to 5k+ units) | ↓ Medium | Low | ↑ High | - None | Allows for better negotiation on raw material costs and production efficiency. |
Submit a sourcing request with us to get quotes on various material and packaging options, helping you find the perfect balance between cost and quality for your pantry jars.
The most critical quality risks are transit damage (breakage) due to poor packaging, seal failure leading to loss of airtightness, and cosmetic defects like scratches or bubbles in the glass. These three areas account for the vast majority of negative customer reviews and returns.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Inadequate packaging: thin outer box, no individual wrapping, loose dividers.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify 'Frustration-Free Packaging': double-walled box, individual wrap (e.g., 5mm bubble wrap), and form-fitting dividers (pulp or cardboard).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Perform a carton drop test (ISTA standard if possible). Inspect a sample of packed units to ensure all components are present and secure.
Root Cause
Poor quality/single-ring silicone gasket; warped wooden lid; poor fit between lid and jar rim.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require food-grade, double-ring silicone gasket. Specify lid flatness tolerance and moisture content for wood to prevent warping.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Fit test the lid on the jar. Submerge a sealed jar in water and press gently; no bubbles should escape.
Root Cause
Poor raw material quality; poor handling during production and packing; dirty molds.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify A-Grade finish with zero tolerance for defects on primary surfaces. Require 100% visual inspection before packing.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Inspect jars under bright, consistent lighting. Compare against an approved 'golden sample' for clarity, color, and surface finish.
Root Cause
Wood not properly dried before manufacturing; exposure to humidity; low-quality adhesive.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify kiln-dried wood with a target moisture content (e.g., 8-12%). Ask about the adhesive used.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually inspect lids for flatness and cracks. Check for a snug, even fit on the jar. Leave a sample in a humid environment for 48h to check for changes.
Root Cause
Supplier substituting cheaper materials to cut costs; lack of process control.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify exact material (e.g., 'Borosilicate glass') and minimum wall thickness (e.g., '3mm'). Request material spec sheets.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Use calipers to measure wall thickness on samples. Compare weight and clarity against the approved pre-production sample.
Root Cause
Low-grade silicone, uncured adhesives in the lid, or chemical residues from cleaning/finishing.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require all materials to be food-grade and specify low-VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) finishes for lids.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Smell the inside of the jar and the lid upon opening. Seal a sample for 24 hours and smell again to check for trapped odors.
Root Cause
Mold issues; miscommunication of specs; no tolerance range defined.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide a detailed technical drawing with all dimensions, capacities (in ml/oz), and acceptable tolerances (e.g., ±5%).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Measure dimensions with calipers. Use a measuring cup or scale with water to verify the capacity of a sample of jars.
Source with us and receive a comprehensive QC checklist tailored for glass and bamboo products to ensure your jars meet the highest quality standards.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Glass Square Storage Jar Food-Grade Transparent Candlestick Fresh-Keeping Tea Jar Storage Jar Sealed Jar Grain Coffee Jar | 2 | ¥2.79 | $2.51 | 1,369,654 | 5,593 | 0.0 |
| NazeNo2001 | Source Item | |
 | Kitchen Storage Jar Moisture-Proof Food-Grade Sealed Jar Plastic Container Spice Storage Jar Sealed Spice Box Storage Box | 2 | ¥2.12 | $1.91 | 865,983 | 5,870 | 0.0 |
| Hi hongNo4515 | Source Item | |
 | High Borosilicate Glass Sealed Jar Storage Jar Kitchen Coarse Cereals Snack Storage Storage Jar Tea Jar Customized Glass Jar | 2 | ¥2.60 | $2.34 | 1,157,684 | 1,522 | 0.0 |
| OtherNo002 | Source Item | |
 | Glass Sealed Jar Manufacturer Supplies Stainless Steel Lid Tea Jar, Grain Food Storage, High Borosilicate Glass Storage Jar | 1 | ¥1.64 | $1.48 | 199,498 | 1,991 | 0.0 |
| ZhongweiNoStainless steel lid tea can, multigrain food storage, high borosilicate glass storage jar, glass sealed jar | Source Item | |
 | Food-Grade Stainless Steel Lid Glass Sealed Jar Refrigerator-Specific Storage Jar Tea Round Moisture-Proof Sealed Storage Jar | 1 | ¥3.65 | $3.29 | 296,860 | 1,639 | 0.0 |
| GlassThick glassNo1 | Source Item | |
 | Black lid 12-piece glass jar Pearl cotton set seasoning dried fruit storage box borosilicate heat-resistant sealed jar wholesale | 1 | ¥51.00 | $45.90 | 351 | 60 | 0.0 |
| Crystal tankNoJG092 | Source Item | |
 | Triangular High Borosilicate Glass Sealed Jar Transparent Glass Tea Jar with Bamboo Lid Storage Jar Storage Glass Jar | 1 | ¥6.60 | $5.94 | 55 | 6 | 0.0 |
| GlassOtherNo2 | Source Item | |
 | Transparent Refrigerator Crisper, Sealed, Odorless, Soft Box Cover, Dust-Proof Fruit and Vegetable Storage Box | 1 | ¥4.66 | $4.19 | 117 | 6 | 0.0 |
| Other1No814-816 | Source Item | |
 | Round Transparent Glass Sealed Jar Cross-Border Supply Kitchen Grain Storage Bottle Bamboo Lid Storage Jar | 2 | ¥1.85 | $1.67 | 34,985 | 123 | 0.0 |
| NoHigh borosilicate glass storage jarGlass | Source Item | |
 | Round Food Storage Sealed Jar Glass Bottle Coffee Bean Storage Jar Tea Jar Sealed Moisture-Proof Storage Box | 1 | ¥12.90 | $11.61 | 322 | 12 | 0.0 |
| OtherNoali-661475551524 | Source Item |
Choose from 1 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Sustainable Pantry Jarsproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Jars → Sustainable Pantry Jars → Sourcing
