Complete sourcing guide for Smart & Tech-Integrated Jars including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$7.64 - $72.9
Verified Suppliers
2
Sourcing Strategies
2
AI-generated product visualizations for Smart & Tech-Integrated Jars



A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taizhou Huangyan Haipu Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. No. 1 Hengxing Road, Beiyang Town, Huangyan District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.96% | 3.8k | Good DisputeGood Service | Storage BoxStorage ContainerStorage Cabinet | Quality 3.0 Returns 3.3 Logistics 3.4 Consult 3.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact | |
Taizhou Qimiao Home Goods Co., Ltd. Building 29, Jiuzhangfu, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.66% | 37.5k | Low ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Storage ContainerStorage BoxTrash Can | Quality 3.7 Returns 4.0 Logistics 3.6 Consult 4.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 9 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinhua, Zhejiang | 20 | ¥0 | ¥2 | ¥7 |
| Taizhou, Zhejiang | 7 | ¥2 | ¥7 | ¥14 |
| Cangzhou, Hebei | 3 | ¥1 | ¥6 | ¥23 |
| Ningbo, Zhejiang | 2 | ¥4 | ¥10 | ¥18 |
| Chaozhou, Guangdong | 2 | ¥5 | ¥16 | ¥32 |
| Zaozhuang, Shandong | 1 | ¥5 | ¥5 | ¥5 |
Zhejiang province is the dominant hub for sourcing tech-integrated jars, with Jinhua offering the largest supplier base at competitive price points and Taizhou specializing in plastics. For premium applications, Guangdong's Chaozhou emerges as a key center for high-quality ceramic jars, albeit at a higher cost.
Best For: Cost-effective sourcing for mass-market smart jars, finding competitively priced components, and projects requiring high-volume production.
Why Strong: Features the largest concentration of suppliers for smart jars, indicating a mature and competitive market. Its location within the Yangtze River Delta provides access to a broad ecosystem for small a...
⚠️ The focus on volume and competitive pricing may require careful vetting to ensure suppliers meet high-end quality or complex technical specifications.
Best For: Sourcing smart jars made from plastic, particularly for the food and cosmetics industries, leveraging the region's deep expertise in plastic molding and production.
Why Strong: Recognized as a well-established manufacturing base for plastic products. This cluster offers a good balance of supplier choice and specialization in plastic materials, suitable for smart jar applicat...
⚠️ Fewer suppliers compared to Jinhua, which may limit options for very large-scale or highly diversified sourcing needs.
Best For: Developing luxury or decorative smart jars where the ceramic vessel is a primary feature, such as for premium cosmetics or specialty food storage.
Why Strong: A renowned center for high-quality ceramic production. The cluster's high average price point suggests a focus on premium materials and craftsmanship, ideal for differentiated, high-end products.
⚠️ Significantly higher price points and likely higher MOQs compared to other clusters. Not suitable for cost-sensitive or mass-market projects.
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taizhou Huangyan Haipu Industr... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.0 | 3.4 |
| Taizhou Qimiao Home Goods Co.,... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.7 | 3.6 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
The primary cost driver for smart jars is the electronics module (PCBA, motor, battery). The second most significant lever is the jar material (glass vs. plastic). A highly effective strategy to lower the perceived unit cost is to change the product configuration, selling a single motorized lid with multiple compatible non-powered jars.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sell as a kit: 1 motorized lid + multiple non-powered jars | ↓ High | Low | ↑ Medium | - None | Dramatically lowers the average cost per jar in a set. Requires sourcing compatible 'dumb' jars. |
| Downgrade jar material: Borosilicate Glass → Tritan Plastic | ↓ High | Medium | - None | - None | Moves from premium to value segment. Tritan is durable but lacks the luxury feel of glass. |
| Downgrade jar material: Tritan Plastic → AS/SAN Plastic | ↓ Medium | High | - None | - None | Significant cost saving for value segment, but increases risk of cracking, a common negative review point. |
| Use off-the-shelf jar body and PCBA | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ High | Avoids custom mold fees and lengthy electronics certification. Best way to accelerate time-to-market. |
| Downgrade lid material: Stainless Steel → ABS/Tritan | ↓ Medium | Low | - None | - None | Reduces cost while maintaining good durability. Affects the premium aesthetic. |
| Simplify electronics (e.g., remove smart pressure sensor) | ↓ Medium | High | - None | - None | Removes auto re-sealing feature. If the primary seal is poor, this leads to rapid freshness loss. |
| Reduce battery capacity (e.g., 2000mAh → 1200mAh) | ↓ Low–Medium | High | - None | - None | Directly impacts user convenience and can lead to negative reviews about frequent recharging. |
| Remove secondary features (e.g., date dial) | ↓ Low | Low | - None | - None | Removes a 'nice-to-have' feature that adds perceived value but is not core to function. |
Ready to build your smart jar? Submit a sourcing request with your target specs and we'll connect you with vetted suppliers who can meet your cost and quality goals.
The most critical and common quality failure is the inability to hold a vacuum, typically caused by a poor gasket or valve. This is followed by electronic failures (DOA, charging issues) and the long-term durability of plastic components, which are prone to cracking.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Low-grade/single-rib silicone gasket; faulty one-way valve; warped lid from poor molding; debris in seal.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify high-grade, double-ribbed silicone gasket. Require 100% air leak test on the valve and final assembly.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Seal the jar, submerge the lid in water, and look for bubbles. Alternatively, leave sealed for 24h and listen for air release upon opening.
Root Cause
Poor PCBA soldering; low-quality electronic components; inadequate ESD protection during assembly.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require use of pre-certified PCBA from a reputable source. Ask for the factory's electronic QC process (e.g., functional test on 100% of units).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Test the charge/discharge cycle and vacuum function on a sample of units from the batch (AQL inspection).
Root Cause
Poor seal causing constant re-sealing; low-quality battery with false capacity rating; inefficient motor/PCBA.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify battery brand/grade, capacity (mAh), and require a protection circuit. Define standby time expectations.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Fully charge a unit, perform 10 vacuum cycles, let it sit for 48 hours, and check remaining battery life.
Root Cause
Using cheaper AS/SAN plastic instead of specified Tritan; thin wall design; stress points from molding.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify material (e.g., Eastman Tritan) and minimum wall thickness. Request mold flow analysis for new designs.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually inspect for stress marks. Perform a drop test on the container from a specified height (e.g., 3 feet).
Root Cause
Low-quality motor; lack of filter allowing liquid/powder ingress into the pump mechanism.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify motor lifecycle expectation (e.g., 10,000 cycles). Ask about protective filters in the pump design.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Cycle the vacuum motor 20-30 times consecutively on a sample unit to check for overheating or failure.
Root Cause
Weak solder joints on the USB-C port; low-quality port component not rated for many plug/unplug cycles.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify port durability rating (e.g., 5,000 cycles). Require reinforcement around the port on the PCB.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Plug and unplug the charging cable 20-30 times on a sample unit, checking for looseness or connection failure.
Root Cause
Supplier cost-cutting by substituting cheaper, non-compliant plastic.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require material declaration and copies of compliance certificates (e.g., BPA-free test report) for the specific material batch.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Cannot be checked visually. Send a sample from mass production to a 3rd party lab for verification if high-risk.
Don't let a faulty seal ruin your product launch. We can help you build a comprehensive QC checklist and connect you with third-party inspectors to protect your investment.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Kitchen Push-Type Sealed Jar Grains Food-Grade Storage Box Snacks Spices Moisture-Proof Plastic Storage Jar | 1 | ¥69.45 | $11.67 | 7,617 | 1,680 | 0.0 |
| QimiaoNo17087 | Source Item | |
![]() | Kitchen Push-Type Sealed Jar Grain Food-Grade Storage Box Snack Spice Moisture-Proof Plastic Storage Jar | 1 | ¥11.59 | $1.95 | 45 | 19 | 0.0 |
| HAIPUNo7087 | Source Item |
Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Smart & Tech-Integrated Jarsproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Jars → Smart & Tech-Integrated Jars → Sourcing