Complete sourcing guide for Recovery Tech Integration Gels including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
Verified Suppliers
1
Sourcing Strategies
0
AI-generated product visualizations for Recovery Tech Integration Gels
A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guangzhou City Haishi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Baiyun District Ping Street Dongping Dongkeng Street No. 2 Yunshan Creative Courtyard Building 1 Room 301 | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.83% | 5.7k | Good DisputeGood Service | MouthwashFacial Care ProcessingHair Care Essential Oil | Quality 3.7 Returns 3.3 Logistics 2.9 Consult 4.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.0 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 9 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | 15 | ¥0 | ¥4 | ¥13 |
| Foshan, Guangdong | 8 | ¥1 | ¥6 | ¥15 |
| Shantou, Guangdong | 5 | ¥0 | ¥2 | ¥4 |
| Zhaoqing, Guangdong | 3 | ¥1 | ¥2 | ¥4 |
| Jinhua, Zhejiang | 2 | ¥1 | ¥3 | ¥6 |
| Linyi, Shandong | 2 | ¥1 | ¥1 | ¥3 |
Guangdong province, led by Guangzhou, is the primary manufacturing hub for muscle recovery gels, leveraging its strength in biotechnology and hydrogel products. Secondary clusters in Guangdong, Shantou and Shandong, Linyi offer more cost-competitive options, while Zhejiang, Jinhua provides expertise from the cosmetics and personal care sector.
Best For: Sourcing a wide variety of formulations, from standard to advanced hydrogels. Ideal for buyers seeking custom formulas and private label production.
Why Strong: Features the highest concentration of suppliers for muscle recovery gels. The area is a recognized biotech innovation and export hub with specific expertise in hydrogel patches and sports therapy item...
⚠️ The wide price range suggests significant variability in formulation complexity, ingredient quality, and supplier scale. Thorough vetting is required.
Best For: Sourcing from established manufacturers who may focus on higher-end or more complex formulations, justifying a premium price.
Why Strong: A significant cluster within the dominant Guangdong manufacturing region. Benefits from the province's overall ecosystem for biotech and personal care products, though at a higher average price point ...
⚠️ Higher average costs compared to nearby clusters like Guangzhou and Shantou may not be suitable for buyers focused on mass-market price points.
Best For: High-volume, cost-effective sourcing of standard muscle recovery gels.
Why Strong: A cost-competitive cluster within the broader Guangdong ecosystem. The low average price point indicates a focus on producing standard formulations at scale for the mass market.
⚠️ May offer fewer options for advanced or highly specialized formulations compared to Guangzhou. The focus is likely on price and volume over innovation...
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou City Haishi Biotechn... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 3.7 | 2.9 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
The final cost of a muscle recovery gel is primarily driven by the formulation's complexity and the packaging choice. To optimize for price, start by evaluating the concentration of premium active ingredients, then simplify the packaging from custom applicators to standard tubes, and finally, consider using a supplier's proven stock formula to eliminate R&D costs.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Switch from custom formula to supplier's stock formula | ↓ High | Low | ↓ Medium | ↓ High | Fastest to market but offers less brand differentiation. |
| Lower concentration of premium active ingredients | ↓ Medium–High | Medium | - None | - None | Must be balanced against performance claims and perceived efficacy. |
| Simplify packaging (e.g., tube vs. roll-on/airless pump) | ↓ Medium–High | Low | ↓ Low | ↓ Medium | Impacts user experience and perceived product value. |
| Remove secondary packaging (individual retail box) | ↓ Low–Medium | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Reduces cost and waste, but may look less premium on a retail shelf. |
| Reduce fill volume per unit (e.g., 75ml vs. 120ml) | ↓ Medium | Low | - None | - None | Lowers the absolute unit cost but increases cost per ml. |
| Increase MOQ (e.g., to 5,000+ units) | ↓ Medium | Low | ↑ High | - None | Enables better price breaks on raw materials and packaging components. |
Ready to formulate your product? Submit a sourcing request with your target ingredients and packaging, and we'll connect you with compliant manufacturers that fit your budget.
The most critical risks involve regulatory non-compliance and formula instability. An incorrect label can get your product blocked at customs, while a formula that separates or grows microbes can lead to recalls and reputational damage. Focus on vetting supplier certifications (GMP) and conducting stability testing upfront.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Inadequate preservative system; non-GMP production environment.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require GMP certification. Ask for preservative efficacy testing (PET / challenge test) results for the formula.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Visually inspect for cloudiness or discoloration. Send random samples to a 3rd-party lab for microbial testing (TVC, Yeast & Mold).
Root Cause
Poor stabilization; incorrect mixing procedure; temperature fluctuations.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Request stability testing data (at 4°C, 25°C, 40°C). Define an acceptable viscosity range (e.g., 15,000-25,000 cP).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Keep a control sample. Compare production batch against it by tilting the tube to check flow consistency. Check for separation (oils/water).
Root Cause
Poor tube sealing (crimp); incompatible cap liner; defective pump or roll-on mechanism.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require packaging compatibility and vacuum leak tests. Specify torque test standards for caps.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Invert and shake 10-20 units. Squeeze tubes firmly. Cycle test pumps/roll-ons 20-30 times to check for failure.
Root Cause
Lack of knowledge of TGA rules (cosmetic vs. therapeutic); incorrect INCI list; unsubstantiated claims.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide final, legally-vetted artwork. Require supplier to confirm INCI list accuracy and compliance with Australian labeling standards.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
100% visual check of labels against the approved artwork proof. Verify batch number and expiry date are printed correctly.
Root Cause
Insufficient concentration of active ingredients; low-grade raw materials; batch inconsistency.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify exact % of key active ingredients (e.g., 5% Menthol). Request a Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for each production batch.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Difficult without a lab. Relies on user testing against the approved sample. The 'cooling' or 'warming' sensation should be consistent.
Root Cause
Incorrect pH level; presence of common allergens; impurities in raw materials.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify a skin-safe pH range (e.g., 4.5-6.0). Request Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) data if available.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Test the pH of the gel with pH strips. Patch test on a small, non-public group before mass distribution.
Don't leave quality to chance. Source with us and we'll help you build a comprehensive QC checklist and testing protocol to protect your brand and your customers.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Cross-border Sports Fever Massage Cream Moisturizing Massage Cream Body Care Body Cream Hot Cream in stock | 1 | ¥4.8 | $0.81 | 8,447 | 287 | 0.0 |
| Body CreamMelao/Really GreatNo | Source Item |
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Recovery Tech Integration Gelsproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Muscle Recovery Gel → Recovery Tech Integration Gels → Sourcing
