Complete sourcing guide for Whole-Body Deodorant including supplier directory, FOB pricing, product specifications, and market validation.
FOB Price Range
$7 - $71.29
Verified Suppliers
2
Sourcing Strategies
2
AI-generated product visualizations for Whole-Body Deodorant
A quick preview of supplier standards, production requirements, and sourcing intelligence from our verified network.
Verified suppliers with years of experience and quality strengths
| Supplier | Images | Tier | Years | Response | Favorites | Key Strengths | Product Expertise | Shop Ratings | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guangzhou Aidai Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Guangzhou City | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.84% | 1.4k | Excellent QualityGood DisputeGood Service | Face CreamHair Essential OilBody Lotion, Cream | Quality 5.0 Returns 2.7 Logistics 4.1 Consult 4.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact | |
Guangzhou Medifee Health Technology Co., Ltd. Guangdong Guangzhou Guangzhou City | Tier 4 | 5+ | 0.85% | 605 | Excellent QualityLow ReturnsGood DisputeGood Service | Scalp Care ProductsBody Lotion, CreamHair Essential Oil | Quality 5.0 Returns 4.0 Logistics 4.1 Consult 4.0 Dispute 4.0 Overall 4.5 | View contact |
0 verified suppliers across 6 manufacturing hubs
Average Ratings Across All Suppliers
0.0
Quality
0.0
Logistics
0.0
Returns
0.0
Disputes
0.0
Support
0.0
Overall
FOB pricing by manufacturing cluster, compare costs across regions
| Region | Suppliers | Min FOB | Avg FOB | Max FOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinhua, Zhejiang | 4 | ¥2 | ¥8 | ¥50 |
| Shantou, Guangdong | 3 | ¥5 | ¥11 | ¥17 |
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | 2 | ¥1 | ¥20 | ¥69 |
| Linyi, Shandong | 1 | ¥3 | ¥5 | ¥8 |
| Foshan, Guangdong | 1 | ¥2 | ¥2 | ¥3 |
| Zhaoqing, Guangdong | 1 | ¥7 | ¥8 | ¥10 |
China's whole-body deodorant manufacturing is concentrated in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces. Clusters in cities like Guangzhou, Shantou, and Jinhua offer a complete ecosystem, from specialized formulation and private label manufacturing to a robust supply chain for diverse packaging options like sprays, sticks, and roll-ons.
Best For: Brands seeking full-service private label partners with expertise in diverse deodorant formulations and access to a mature cosmetics supply chain.
Why Strong: A major powerhouse for the cosmetics industry, offering a deep supply chain for private label manufacturing, custom formulation, and a wide variety of product formats including sprays, sticks, gels, a...
⚠️ As a major cosmetics hub, competition for production slots can be high, and MOQs may be larger for more established manufacturers.
Best For: Sourcing cost-effective finished goods and specialized deodorant packaging components like bottles, sprays, and roll-on containers.
Why Strong: Represents a significant production and wholesale center within Zhejiang province, known for both finished deodorant products and specialized packaging. This area offers a high concentration of suppli...
⚠️ While strong in production and wholesale, may have less emphasis on cutting-edge R&D compared to specialized cosmetic hubs like Guangzhou.
Best For: Buyers prioritizing cost-efficiency for mass-market deodorants, leveraging the region's strong capabilities in packaging production.
Why Strong: Located within the broader Pearl River Delta manufacturing ecosystem, this cluster benefits from proximity to extensive plastics, molding, and packaging supply chains. It presents a cost-competitive o...
⚠️ Suppliers may be more focused on high-volume production rather than bespoke or niche formulations.
Top-tier verified manufacturers with quality ratings and capabilities
| Company | Tier | Years | Quality | Logistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Aidai Cosmetics Co.,... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Guangzhou Medifee Health Techn... | TIER 4 | 0+ | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Supplier | Yrs | Rating ↓ | Actions |
|---|
Tip: Click on a supplier row to see detailed ratings breakdown. Ratings above 4.0 indicate reliable suppliers.
The primary cost drivers for whole-body deodorant are the formula complexity (active ingredients, custom scents) and the packaging format (aerosol vs. stick). To optimize for price, start by leveraging a supplier's stock formula, then simplify packaging components and finishes before adjusting performance claims.
Confidence: High| Pricing Lever | Cost Impact | Quality Risk | MOQ Impact | Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use supplier's stock formula vs. custom R&D | ↓ High | Low | ↓ Medium | ↓ High | Fastest way to market. Less differentiation but proven stability. |
| Switch from Stick/Aerosol to Cream in a Squeeze Tube | ↓ Medium–High | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Changes product format and user experience but simplifies manufacturing. |
| Use stock fragrances vs. custom scents | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Medium | ↓ Medium | Reduces development time and fragrance MOQ, but offers less brand uniqueness. |
| Remove soft-touch finish from plastic components | ↓ Low–Medium | Low | - None | ↓ Low | Reduces cost of a secondary process. Affects premium tactile feel. |
| Reduce performance claim (e.g., 72hr → 24hr) | ↓ Low–Medium | Medium | - None | ↓ Medium | Lowers cost of active ingredients and expensive clinical substantiation tests. |
| Use standard packaging components vs. custom-tooled | ↓ Medium | Low | ↓ Medium | ↓ High | Avoids high upfront mold costs and long tooling lead times. |
| Limit safety testing (e.g., remove 'Gynecologist-Tested') | ↓ Low | High | - None | ↓ Low | Saves on testing fees but limits marketing claims and increases liability risk. |
| Increase MOQ (e.g., 10k → 30k units) | ↓ Medium | Low | ↑ High | - None | Enables better price breaks on raw materials and automated filling. |
Ready to create your deodorant line? Submit a sourcing request with your target cost and features, and we'll match you with the right formula and packaging suppliers.
Based on market feedback, the biggest quality risks are ineffective odor control, skin irritation, and packaging damage during transit. Clear specifications and targeted QC checks are essential to prevent these common complaints.
Confidence: HighRoot Cause
Insufficient concentration of active ingredients; unstable formula.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify performance claim (e.g., '24-Hour Odor Protection') and request supporting clinical or panel test data.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Conduct in-house panel testing on pre-production samples. Request Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for active ingredient levels in each batch.
Root Cause
Harsh ingredients (e.g., high alcohol/baking soda), undeclared allergens, pH imbalance.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require 'Dermatologist-Tested' or 'Hypoallergenic' claims with supporting RIPT reports. Provide a list of prohibited ingredients.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Review the full ingredient list (INCI) and Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the formula. Patch test samples on a small group of users.
Root Cause
Thin aluminum cans; weak plastic caps; inadequate shipping cartons.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify can wall thickness, plastic resin type for caps, and require reinforced master cartons or individual protective sleeves.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Perform a drop test on a master carton from waist height. Manually inspect a sample of units for dents and functional caps.
Root Cause
Incorrect ingredient ratios; poor emulsification during production.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Define the desired application feel (e.g., 'quick-dry', 'non-sticky', 'powder finish') in the product brief.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Apply a sample to the skin to check absorption time and final feel. Visually inspect the product for any graininess or separation.
Root Cause
Poor formula stability; reaction between ingredients and packaging; light exposure.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Require stability test results (e.g., 3 months at 40°C). Specify opaque or UV-coated packaging if formula is light-sensitive.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Keep a retained sample in a warm, bright place for 2-4 weeks and compare it against a sample kept in a cool, dark place.
Root Cause
Formula incompatibility with actuator; low-quality plastic mechanism.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Specify quality standards for components (e.g., brand of actuator, lifecycle of stick mechanism).
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Actuate a sample of spray cans 20-30 times. Fully twist up and down a sample of deodorant sticks to check for smooth operation.
Root Cause
Poor quality fragrance oil; batch-to-batch variation; ingredient degradation.
What to Specify / Ask Supplier
Provide an approved physical scent standard (master sample). Require the supplier to keep a master sample for batch matching.
QC Check (What "Good" Looks Like)
Smell the production sample and compare it directly against the approved master sample. Check for any off-notes.
Don't let quality issues damage your brand. Source with us and receive a comprehensive QC checklist tailored to your specific deodorant format and claims.
Use this data to create your product specifications, reach out to suppliers, and validate your pricing strategy. Start with small sample orders to test quality.
Real product samples with pricing, MOQ, and supplier ratings
| Product | Title | MOQ | Price (CNY) | Price (USD) | Sale QuantityHow many units sold | OrdersHow many orders in Alibaba/1688 | Rating | Tiered Pricing | Key Features | Link | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Modified Chitosan Antibacterial Gel for Women Women's Private Cervical Erosion Deodorization Bacteriostatic Antipruritic Gynecological Gel | 1 | ¥13.00 | $11.70 | 9,860 | 1,999 | 4.0 |
| ChitosanXiuzhengGynecological Gel | Source Item |
Choose from 2 pricing strategies based on your target market
This sourcing playbook provides actionable guidance for importing Whole-Body Deodorantproducts. Our data-driven approach combines supplier intelligence with market validation to help you make informed purchasing decisions and minimize sourcing risks.
First orders typically require 30-50% deposit with balance before shipment (T/T). As relationships develop, suppliers may offer 30/70 splits or even open terms for established buyers. Letter of Credit (L/C) is available for larger orders but involves additional fees.
Document issues with photos immediately upon receipt. Most suppliers offer replacement or credit for legitimate defects within agreed AQL limits. Having clear quality specifications in your purchase order strengthens your position in disputes.
Third-party inspection is recommended for first orders and orders over $10,000. Services like SGS or Bureau Veritas cost $200-400 per inspection and can prevent costly quality issues. Pre-shipment inspection is most common; in-line inspection adds additional assurance.
Navigation: All Categories → Deodorant → Whole-Body Deodorant → Sourcing
